If a literal interpretation of the text is employed, one might wonderwhythe pair did not do something to end their waiting, such as searching forGodot, but, if one takes a more metaphoric look at the play, Godot becomessomething for which the pair may have to wait.
The heroic figure has deteriorated in the characters in the characters of Vladimir and Estragon. This is because the characters portray some behavior patterns, which can be regarded as inferior. Rather than appearing has heroes in the play, Vladimir and Estragon appear as weak characters who spend a considerable amount of their time while waiting for someone. They appear as underdogs in the play, and their contribution is looked down upon by the author. As such, the heroic figure in the two characters has totally deteriorated.
Soon, Lucky and Pozzo, slave and master, appear and the two men mistake Pozzo for Godot. After interacting with the two, Pozzo and Lucky depart and a boy arrives to tell the men that Godot will not arrive that night, but tomorrow. Act two opens the next day, with Vladimir and Estragon again waiting by the tree. Godot never arrives.
Research papers on Waiting for Godot can look at the play from several standpoints. Waiting for Godot can be examined sociologically, psychologically or from its purely literary value. Have Paper Masters' writers custom write your research paper on Waiting for Godot.
The play itself has been open to numerous attempts at interpretation, as Beckett himself was vague about both the characterizations and his own ideas behind the play. Waiting for Godot is one of the most famous in history, defying understanding but retaining a powerful hold on both actors and audiences around the world.
If oneis always waiting for something to happen, the periods during that waitend up being meaningless, and, if the event finally does happen, theprocess repeats itself.
The other reason why the two characters cannot be regarded as representatives of modern persons is because Estragon appears to be an assistant of Vladimir. This emanates from the fact that Vladimir seems to portray some form of superiority over Estragon. This can be depicted in the scenes whereby Estragon is seen to have challenges in memory, has to depend on his friend who tells him what he should do, and even faces challenges when he wants to remove his boots. All these portray that he is not a modern person as he is easily manipulated by other characters. Another instance, which shows that the two characters do not represent modern persons, is the fact that Vladimir is the one who has a direct connection with Godot while Estragon does not have this connection. He does not have the intellectual capacity and ability, which can match the knowledge that his friend Vladimir has (Beckett & Barnes & Noble Books, 2011).
In the play, the two characters cannot be regarded as representative of modern persons. This can be depicted by the fact that these characters tend to portray some form of behaviors, which may not be present in modern persons. For example, at the start of the play, the two characters meet under a tree. This means that they have some traditional views of life; men in the olden days used to meet and discuss some issues. The two characters do not represent modern persons since their aim of meeting under the tree is to wait for someone. This portrays them as idle and as persons who have little to do. They have ample time to waste, and this explains why they meet to wait for someone. As they wait for Godot, they get interrupted by a master and his slave. The master distracts their attention, and this indicates that they cannot be regarded as modern persons (Bachner, 2008).
Waiting for Godot is a play authored By Samuel Beckett. In the play, the characters wait for Godot, but he does not arrive. The fact that Godot does not turn up has led to varying interpretations of the play. This essay will analyze Vladimir and Estragon as portrayed by Samuel Beckett and whether these two characters can be regarded as modern persons. Moreover, the paper will examine whether the heroic figure has deteriorated in the characters of Vladimir and Estragon.
At first Vladimir disagreed with him, but even he laterexpressed some doubt when he said to Estragon, But you said we were hereyesterday. (8-9) This situation presents a problem in logic, for whywould they not remember what they did the day before and, if they did waitin the same place yesterday, why would they not recognize the landscape?
Towards the beginning of the play, Vladimir and Estragon argued aboutwhether or not they were waiting for Godot at the correct location andargued about what they had done yesterday.
Because it was neverrevealed conclusively who or what Godot was, this unknown force can beseen to metaphorically represent that for which the audience is waiting intheir own lives.