16 Oct 2012 Conservative political analyst says the 2nd presidential debate of 2012 was the best he'd ever seen. For more Essay On Second Presidential Debate 2012 on this story, click here:Essay On Second Presidential Debate 2012
16 Oct 2012 Read the full transcript from the second presidential debate between at the second Essay On Second Presidential Debate 2012 presidential debate in Hempstead, N.Y. on Oct. 16, 2012.
The “great debate” of the Presidential Election for 2004 was well aware of the media power, understanding that there is a 24-news cycle available through TV, newspapers, and Internet.
Historians still argue about how significant the Great Debates really were in deciding the election, but there’s no doubt that the broadcasts marked a turning point in American politics. For better or worse, TV would go on to become an indispensable part of presidential campaigns, permanently altering the ways politicians tried to win voters’ hearts and minds. Presidential debates, meanwhile, took a bit longer to catch on. Having seen how badly Nixon got burned, the major party candidates refused to square off on TV again until 1976.
I knew that I needed an innovative campaign strategy, and that the basic "vote for me and I'll get you whatever you want" route wouldn't be enough. I knew that having a memorable speech would be imperative to success, as it was my one chance to directly address the entire class. I led off the speech with my favorite joke, and was honest with my classmates encouraging their votes. I had worn a number of shirts with different messages on them, and, as I went through my speech, I'd take one off to reveal a new message. When I reached the last shirt with a huge money symbol on it (symbolizing the increased revenue I was promising the class) my friends interspersed in the audience launched monopoly money into the air on cue. The next day I came in early to school once and painted a giant chalk "ASA for VP" sign in the parking lot. I chronicled all of this on a website I created, and all of my campaign posters directed any interesting students to the site, which ended up hosting a heated debate between my opponent and myself. After 400 votes in the site's mock poll, I was in a dead heat with my main competitor. That poll, however, was a lesson in statistical anomalies: I won the 4-person race with over 60% of the vote.
On July 22, a blisteringly hot summer day in Washington, Lincoln called his Cabinet together and told them that he had reached a momentous decision. A President who customarily polled his Cabinet on all issues of public policy, and then deferred to their collective wisdom, he bluntly told them this time that he would entertain no opposition or debate on the main point. He had already made up his mind. Then he unfolded some hand-written papers and slowly read aloud a sketchily composed preliminary order freeing slaves in the rebellious states. No one present dissented. But Secretary of State Seward expressed a sensible concern. With the war going so badly, he worried, would not most Americans regard an emancipation announcement be as "a cry for help—our last shriek on the retreat?" Seward proposed postponing the Proclamation until the Union could win a victory on the battlefield. Reluctantly, Lincoln conceded the wisdom in Seward's suggestion. But he must have felt enormous frustration. His top commander in the East, General George B. McClellan, had just led his massive army in a lumbering, clumsy attempt to capture the Confederate capital of Richmond, only to be repulsed by a much smaller defending army. The humiliation had all but obscured the heartening news from the West, where a rising general, Ulysses S. Grant, had won a costly but convincing victory at the Battle of Shiloh.
The contest was among a CCSD, UNLV, and LVCVA unveiled in June, to provide hands-on learning opportunities for local K-12 and college students that aligned with election-themed educational initiatives. Lesson plans were created for K-12 students, including an online "Join the Debates" curriculum through the Commission on Presidential Debates. On Sept. 26, more than 150 CCSD middle and high school debate team members gathered at UNLV to watch the first presidential debate alongside the university's debate team. Additionally, voter education activities and debate watch events were held at various CCSD school sites throughout the debate season, UNLV professors created a dozen election-themed courses, and the university partnered with College of Southern Nevada and Nevada State College to host watch parties.
The same could not be said of Nixon. The sitting Vice President had run himself ragged trying to fulfill a campaign promise to visit all 50 states, and had recently spent nearly two weeks in the hospital after banging his knee on a car door and contracting a Staph infection. He showed up at the debate with a 102-degree fever and a sore leg, having whacked his hurt knee a second time on his way into the building. Debate producer Don Hewitt would later say the Republican candidate’s pale complexion and gaunt face made him look “like death warmed over.” Nixon refused to cancel, however, saying that dropping out so late would make him look like a “chicken.”
Lincoln was elected President in 1860 pledging to do nothing to interfere with slavery in the slave states, where, he understood, the institution was protected by the fatal flaw of the U. S. Constitution that counted slaves and implicitly condoned their bondage. "If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong,"he still believed. But he cautioned that personal belief did not give him the right to act once inaugurated. After more than a year of Civil War, however, Lincoln came to the conclusion that the only way to restore the Union was to wage war not only against Confederate armies, but also against slavery itself. "We must free the slaves,"he confided, "or ourselves be subdued." Then why did he not order slaves freed immediately? Lincoln believed that the country was simply not ready for it. "Public sentiment is everything," he had declared during the Lincoln-Douglas debates four years earlier. "With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed. Consequently he who molds public sentiment goes deeper than he who enacts statutes or pronounces decisions." Until 1862, Lincoln was not ready to do the latter because he had not yet done the former. But as he had said in 1856 and doubtless recalled in 1862: "Whoever can change public opinion can change the government." This is what he ultimately did.
John F. Kennedy knew the debates could be the shot in the arm that his campaign needed. The 43-year-old Massachusetts senator had emerged from relative obscurity to become the Democratic nominee, but he was still struggling against the perception that he was too inexperienced to be Commander in Chief. He spent the hours before the contest cramming his head with facts and figures and having his aides quiz him on possible debate questions. Knowing that his face would be beamed to millions of black and white TV sets, he also took a long nap and worked on his tan on the roof of his Chicago hotel. When Kennedy finally arrived at CBS studios on the evening of September 26, he was rested and ready for action. Even Richard Nixon later wrote that, “I had never seen him looking so fit.”
The contest — a between UNLV, CCSD, and LVCVA — challenged local public and district-sponsored charter school students in grades nine through 12 to submit essays answering: “Are Presidential Debates necessary: Why or why not?” Students were encouraged to explore the election process prior to the 2016 election cycle’s third and final presidential debate held Oct. 19 at UNLV and were asked to consider: how debates affect public opinion, how presidential debates have influenced past elections, and how changes in the way people communicate have altered the dynamics of the debate process.