Assignments got your hair on fire?

Douse the flames with our full-range writing service!

Experienced academic writing professionals are at your fingertips. Use this handy tool to get a price estimate for your project.

A Historical Summary Of Consider Lobster Other Essays

Now it was at Minturnae,according tolegend, that Apicius lived--eighty years before Marital's time--and enjoyed the local magnificentshrimps,which grow bigger than the shrimps at Smyrna, bigger indeed than the lobsters at Alexandria' toquoteAthnaeus...Pliny the Younger boasted of good shrimps a little further north, at his Laurentan villa.

300)[1912]
"Flaked Crab Meat

Utilize the contents of a can of crab's meat and with a silver fork flak into small pieces, adding two chopped hard-boiled eggs, one tablespoonful of minced parsley and salt and paprika to taste; meanwhile prepare in the chafing dish about two cupfuls of rich cream sauce, by blending together an even tablespoonful each of melted butter and flour and diluting to the proper consistency with milk or cream; be sure that the sauce boils, then stir in the other ingredients and serve on rounds of hot buttered toast, garnishing each portion with a little grated egg yolks.

Consider Lobster Other Essays Options

Brain power book review consider lobster other essays

I'm a health buff but I am not trying to be a Vegan but reading Consider the Lobster by David Foster Wallace makes me curious in some way.

There is a common perception that lobster was considered a poor man's food,and this many have been in the case in colonial New England but not back in Europe.

What I'm saying is that Wallace will approach a topic from any angle he considers useful - it's an almost novelistic approach to essay writing, and narrative convention is certainly one of the angles he'll use. It's genuinely hard for me to describe how good this is, because, although the topics covered are varied and interesting, it's really the author's voice and his amazing prose style which sell the work, and I simply lack Wallace's skill to convey it for you here. Like Clive James' prose, it's always readable, conversational, and almost friendly, yet grammatically flawless and immaculately constructed to deliver maximum meaning. Unlike James' prose, however, there's something very contemporary about Wallace's writing. I was occasionally reminded, for reasons I could barely explain, of Bret Easton Ellis' work. As far as I know, at least, of essayists from this era, Wallace is in a class of his own, and I can only hope and pray that Generation Y still has the capacity to produce writers with the same love for, respect for and mastery of the English language.

Consider the Lobster - Wikipedia

The footnotes. I better mention the footnotes, not least because these constitute something that the frequently aforementioned Clive James would NOT, I suspect, have any truck with. Basically, Wallace seems to suffer from the word-lover's fear of failing to express himself fully. The irony is that, if any writer possesses the natural gifts to accomplish this within the traditional bounds of his prose, it's Wallace. But no. Wallace uses footnotes, and he uses them like Chuck Norris uses machine gun fire, eg as a sort of cologne. It's a rare page of Wallace's writing which contains only one footnote. Usually there are more. Often the footnotes stretch across multiple pages, sometimes they contain sub-headings, sometimes the footnotes themselves contain footnotes. Within the critical/journalistic/essay writing of Consider the Lobster, I found this structural quirk distracting at worst, and entertaining at best - as a word-lover myself, they function almost like DVD extras. (Within the novelistic framework of Wallace's opus Infinite Jest, though, I found them borderline intolerable, but that's another book review for another time, and anyway most of those were endnotes, not footnotes, which are much harder to read in parallel.)

Consider lobster other essays

In addition to his singular, pyrotechnic prose, encyclopedic mastery of disparate information systems, and an almost unparalleled breadth and depth of imagination, what makes David Foster Wallace’s books interesting is that although they appear at first to be a grab-bag of unrelated topics, each one is in fact woven from a particular theme’s thread: thus, the 1996 novel Infinite Jest and American entertainment culture, the 1999 story collection Brief Interviews with Hideous Men and male heterosexuality, and the 2003 story collection Oblivion and corporate despair. In Consider the Lobster, his most recent collection of essays, although his subjects range from pornography to dictionaries, Kafka to talk radio, crustacean neurology to sports autobiographies, the most fundamental issue is politics. In an era when every former politician and current talking head pens their screed about their own patriotism, virtue, and intelligence while attacking the other side of the aisle, Wallace is not merely refreshingly neutral but legitimately perceptive. Unlike most other writers, Wallace is neither a moralist, a satirist, nor an apologist, and because of it, he stands at a vantage from which he truly can observe.

Versatile Services that Make Studying Easy
We write effective, thought-provoking essays from scratch
We create erudite academic research papers
We champion seasoned experts for dissertations
We make it our business to construct successful business papers
What if the quality isn’t so great?
Our writers are sourced from experts, and complete an obstacle course of testing to join our brigade. Ours is a top service in the English-speaking world.
How do I know the professor won’t find out?
Everything is confidential. So you know your student paper is wholly yours, we use CopyScape and WriteCheck to guarantee originality (never TurnItIn, which professors patrol).
What if it doesn’t meet my expectations?
Unchanged instructions afford you 10 days to request edits after our agreed due date. With 94% satisfaction, we work until your hair is comfortably cool.
Clients enjoy the breezy experience of working with us
Click to learn our proven method

Consider the Lobster Summary - by Undeadthing


Consider the Lobster and Other Essays (review) - …

In addition to his singular, pyrotechnic prose, encyclopedic mastery of disparate information systems, and an almost unparalleled breadth and depth of imagination, what makes David Foster Wallace’s books interesting is that although they appear at first to be a grab-bag of unrelated topics, each one is in fact woven from a particular theme’s thread: thus, the 1996 novel Infinite Jest and American entertainment culture, the 1999 story collection Brief Interviews with Hideous Men and male heterosexuality, and the 2003 story collection Oblivion and corporate despair. In Consider the Lobster, his most recent collection of essays, although his subjects range from pornography to dictionaries, Kafka to talk radio, crustacean neurology to sports autobiographies, the most fundamental issue is politics. In an era when every former politician and current talking head pens their screed about their own patriotism, virtue, and intelligence while attacking the other side of the aisle, Wallace is not merely refreshingly neutral but legitimately perceptive. Unlike most other writers, Wallace is neither a moralist, a satirist, nor an apologist, and because of it, he stands at a vantage from which he truly can observe.

Consider the Lobster and Other Essays (review) ..

A collection of essays by Wallace. Most were written for magazines, then shortened dramatically by the editors of said magazines, then published. Lobster allows for publication of the expansive original submissions, and expansive they are - in two-hundred plus pages, the number of articles barely reaches double figures. There's a huge piece (originally commissioned by Rolling Stone) in which Wallce follows the McCain campaign for Republican candidacy in 2000. There's a great big piece, ostensibly reviewing a book on American English usage, which is also both a potted history of the author's personal relationship with the subject, and the subject itself. There's a weighty essay about his neighbourhood's reaction to the twin towers falling. There's a big long piece about the American porn industry, climaxing (har!) with Wallace's attendance at the Adult Video Awards in Las Vegas, AKA the Porno Oscars. Lastly, there's a surprisingly extensive and thoughtful article, originally for a gourmet magazine, about the Maine lobster festival, which wanders off into areas concerning the morality of modern human eating habits which must have raised editorial eyebrows and cleavers simultaneously. Despite the digressions and discursiveness, however, you can rest assured that all articles are annotated, asterisked, footnoted, and end-noted to an extent that would please a serial killer with Asperger's syndrome.

Consider the Lobster | Soheb Siddiqui

To my daughter when she turns eighteen (many, many years from now): Well, hey there, kiddo. Member me, the mom you used to love but now probably hate with every. Consider Lobster Other Essays

An Analysis of "Consider the Lobster" (Morality Lifestyle)

Further, Wallace hangs around with the tech crews (cameramen, sound recordists, etc), who, unlike most journalists, endure crushing campaign schedules from start to finish and turn out to be, in an off-the-record sort of way, the most astute and experienced analysts of the spin-tastic PR bonanza which is modern political campaigning. Wallace looks honestly at what McCain symbolises to the man's own generation, the author's generation, the author himself, and the US voting public of 2000, a time when McCain captured something in the zeitgeist and could well have won the nomination without porcine coprophage Karl Rove fucking him over for the second time. Wallace also has the guts to ponder (if not actually investigate) the question of whether one of the campaign's most iconic incidents was a set-up. He then feeds his consideration of this possibility back into the overarching theme of the article, that being the possibility that McCain represents an alternative to the cynicism of modern US politics, particularly as viewed by the demographic of Rolling Stone, who grew up with the spin and the lies and the "message" and the "narrative" and who were a LOT less shocked then their parents when it was revealed that Bill Clinton had lied about fucking an intern. (A politician, lying?? When he thought he could get away with it?!?!)

Project MUSE - Consider the Lobster and Other Essays (review)

See what you think, anyway - it might piss you off, it might not. I mean the thing with footnotes is that, like DVD extras, you don't HAVE to partake - I suspect most of them were editorially excised from the originally published articles - but there's something about tiny writing that draws the eye. The real question, I suppose, is that, if Wallace is such a freakin' genius, why can't he incorporate the relevant parts of his footnotes into the main body of his writing, and throw the rest away? Well the answer is that he can, because he does it in, for instance, his first book of essays, "A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again", where the minutiae and factoids either make it into the body copy or are tossed out. The fact that, in Lobster, there are hundreds more of the things, and that Lobster is a later work where Wallace would have been more confident and less subject to an editor's influence, suggests that Wallace simply likes footnotes, does not find them hard to read himself, and considers them a valid tool in structuring an argument. Quite frankly, I'm not a good enough writer myself to say if he's right, but I'd love to know what Clive James thought...

89%
of clients claim significantly improved grades thanks to our work.
98%
of students agree they have more time for other things thanks to us.
Clients Speak
“I didn’t expect I’d be thanking you for actually improving my own writing, but I am. You’re like a second professor!”