Whether or not this is intended, the effect is clear: Black Cat attracts viewers who like to see violence without any censorship and Sailor Moon appeals to people who are not as into the depictions of fighting.
He is, like the Nordic amongmen, one of those who govern their own lives or die.
We have but to glance analytically at the two animals to see the points pileup in favour of the cat.
Now when dogs and cats are considered, thestolid churl sees only the two animals before him, and bases his favour on their relative capacityto pander to his sloppy, unformed ideas of ethics and friendship and flattering subservience.
On the other hand the gentleman and thinker sees each in all its natural affiliations, and cannotfail to notice that in the great symmetries of organic life dogs fall in with slovenly wolvesand foxes and jackals and coyotes and dingoes and painted hyaenas, whilst cats walk proudlywith the jungle’s lords, and own the haughty lion, the sinuous leopard, the regal tiger,and the shapely panther and jaguar as their kin.
He believes that the world is against him and a lot of the visions that we see appear before him, the doppelganger animal, the gallows, the cat in the wall, can all be attributed to this inflated sense of importance.
The fire is such a violent coincidence that it seems to have been caused by some supernatural power: like the narrator’s rage, or perhaps the cat itself.
It is this phenomenon that the narrator uses to explain his attack on the animal, and in the spirit of perverseness, he also commits a further act, and hangs the cat from a tree.
They had many pets including "...birds, gold fish, a fine dog, rabbits, a small monkey, and ." The cat was a large, beautiful animal who was entirely black.
The reader also discovers (with the introduction of Pluto into the story) that the narrator is superstitious, as he recounts that his wife made "...frequent allusion to the ancient popular notion, [that] all black cats [are] witches in disguise." Even though the narrator denies this (much as the narrator in denies that he or she is insane), the reader becomes increasingly aware of his superstitious belief as the story progresses.
However, Herman Melville and Edgar Allan Poe also harbour intriguing relationships with these contrasting themes, which are implicit within "Bartleby" and "The Black Cat" respectively.
This is not, of course, the only important aspect of the term, and I shall explore some of the other important defining features of Black Humor before moving on to discuss its use in Kurt Vonnegut's Cat's Cradle3....
Pluto had not a white hair upon any portion of his body; but this cat had a large, although indefinite splotch of white, covering nearly the whole region of the breast." The cat responded by purring loudly, and the narrator talked to the owner of the tavern about purchasing the cat; however, "this person made no claim to it--knew nothing of it--had never seen it before."
I Suspect that use of irony in Edgar Allan Poe's short story, "The Black Cat," is one of the main points which allows the hidden character of the Narrator, and the truth of the situation to be revealed and helps the reader to comprehend the story better....
Altogether, we may see that the dog appeals to those primitiveemotional souls whose chief demands on the universe are for meaningless affection, aimless companionship,and flattering attention and subservience; whilst the cat reigns among those more contemplativeand imaginative spirits who ask of the universe only the objective sight of poignant, etherealbeauty and the animate symbolisation of Nature’s bland, relentless, reposeful, unhurried,and impersonal order and sufficiency.
Though he assures us that his wife’s superstitions are unimportant, the mention of them increases the sense of foreboding we already have for the titular black cat.