It follows that your ability to write syntheses depends on your ability to infer relationships among sources - essays, articles, fiction, and also nonwritten sources, such as lectures, interviews, observations.
What About the "Synthesis" Part?
A Rhetorical Analysis Should :
Show awareness of the rhetorical situation
who, what, when, where
of the piece--see the previous presentation on "Rhetoric and Rhetorical Analysis" for details.)
Explore the writer’s or speaker’s purpose and main point/s
Identify the techniques (or tools) used
Show examples of those techniques, and occasionally comment on their effectiveness.
Each Body Paragraph:
Should have its own topic sentence
A rhetorical analysis essay breaks a work of non-fiction into parts and then explains how the parts work together to create certain effects.
Analysis is clearly being understood here in the regressive sense—as involving the working back from ‘what is sought’, taken as assumed, to something more fundamental by means of which it can then be established, through its converse, synthesis. For example, to demonstrate Pythagoras's theorem—that the square on the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle is equal to the sum of the squares on the other two sides—we may assume as ‘given’ a right-angled triangle with thethree squares drawn on its sides. In investigating the properties of this complex figure we may draw further (auxiliary) lines between particular points and find that there are a number of congruent triangles, from which we can begin to work out the relationship between the relevant areas. Pythagoras's theorem thus depends on theorems about congruent triangles, and once these—and other—theorems have been identified (and themselves proved), Pythagoras's theorem can be proved. (The theorem is demonstrated in Proposition 47 of Book I of Euclid's Elements.)
When synthesizing two things, you compare them and point out their differences, but emphasize their similarities, and find enough common ground that you can say, together, they present a single idea or a single thesis. I think Wallace and Freire both have common goals or agendas; they just arrive there in different ways. Locate their thesis, their primary concepts, their primary reason for writing these essays, and see where they overlap. That overlap—the similarities in concept—is the synthesis.
In order to write a successful synthesis essay, you must gather research on your chosen topic, discover meaningful connections throughout your research, and develop a unique and interesting argument or perspective.
This assignment asks that you synthesize the essays by Freire and Wallace, and analyze their rhetoric (their method of persuasion), and their purpose.
In writing the synthesis paper, you need to have a summary. This is one of the best ways to organize the paper with related sources after the other. The summary will be very useful in handling other methods involved.
The skills you have while enrolled in this course are essential in composing your very own synthesis. Before you are in a position to draw relationships between 2 or more sources, you need to fully understand well what those sources say; you need to be able to come up with a summary of all of those sources. It will be of help to you if you can give at least part of the summaries of those sources in your essay. You also need to go far from the summary to be able to create judgments; this must be based on your critical reading of the sources.
The second most vital ingredient in the formula was to choose two texts from our Allyn & Bacon Guide to Writing book which would be the backbone of our synthesis essay that we would have to expand on and create our own ideas from....
A synthesis paper is a discussion in written form that is composed of 1 or more sources. It keeps an eye on your ability to write the synthesis depending on your capacity to assume the relationships from sources, articles, observations, interviews and lectures too. This process is not new anymore for you, because you deal with relationships most of the time. For instance, it may be something you have read in the news, something you have seen, between you and the teaching styles of your mentor, etc. in an academic synthesis, you sort the relationships that you have dealt with from various sources.
Phenomenology is not the only source of analytic methodologies outside those of the analytic tradition. Mention might be made here, too, of R. G. Collingwood, working within the tradition of British idealism, which was still a powerful force prior to the Second World War. In his Essay on Philosophical Method (1933), for example, he criticizes Moorean philosophy, and develops his own response to what is essentially the paradox of analysis (concerning how an analysis can be both correct and informative), which he recognizes as having its root in Meno's paradox. In his Essay on Metaphysics (1940), he puts forward his own conception of metaphysical analysis, in direct response to what he perceived as the mistaken repudiation of metaphysics by the logical positivists. Metaphysical analysis is characterized here as the detection of ‘absolute presuppositions’, which are taken as underlying and shaping the various conceptual practices that can be identified in the history of philosophy and science. Even among those explicitly critical of central strands in analytic philosophy, then, analysis in one form or another can still be seen as alive and well.
Take a look at the Wal-Mart essay on the following pages. It is a synthesis essay based on the Wal-Mart essays from the 6th edition of the WARAC. Read very carefully and take specific notice of how the author uses the sources to support the argument being made. Nowhere in the essay is there any one source essay being regurgitated or blindly repeated. The author is always showing you how to mix and match the information that has been read to support that author's particular view. You probably will disagree with the final conclusion, but you should at least recognize the elements used to build the argument.